The rationale behind setting a maximum two-week limit for a cohort's assessment period is multifaceted and stems largely from considerations related to reliability and accuracy in testing methodologies. This two-week period is consciously designed as a focused snapshot in time. It provides a rich and comprehensive insight into the cohort's abilities, knowledge, or characteristics at a given point, capturing the necessary breadth and depth of data. At the same time, it avoids the pitfalls of a broader period, which might be unduly influenced by longer-term changes or learning experiences. Thus, it ensures that we're observing stable traits or knowledge rather than transient factors. Further, the two-week boundary serves to clearly delineate sessions for different cohorts. By assigning each cohort its distinct timeframe, we eliminate potential overlap or cross-influence, fostering a clean slate for comparison and contrast between cohorts. This practice is crucial for nuanced analysis and research, enabling us to discern patterns, differences, and trends across groups. From a user experience perspective, a two-week limit for testing encourages an efficient and well-organized process. This concise timeframe motivates effective planning and execution of testing protocols, ensuring a smooth testing experience for participants. Moreover, it supports timely completion of assessments and prompt analysis of results, which in turn contributes to the rapid advancement of knowledge and understanding.